There is an old adage: be
careful what you wish for. Many unionists would like to have seen the IRA
defeated 19 years ago, when the last ceasefire was announced. It didn’t happen. Likewise, many
would like to see republicans wearing sack cloth and ashes. That isn’t going to happen either.
We are where we are and – imperfect
though our peace is – we are in a much better place than a generation ago. Have
we forgotten that only 17 years ago this month, 29 men, women and children, and
two unborn babies, were killed in the worst atrocity of the Troubles, in Omagh?
The relative peace we enjoy didn’t materialise out of
thin air. It had to be worked at.
The Chief Constable’s assessment last
weekend that, while an infrastructure
existed at a senior level of the Provisional IRA, the organisation was
not on a "war footing" came as no surprise to the Secretary of State.
It appears however to have astonished some unionist politicians. It also seems
to have caught some nationalists by surprise and, at the same time, piqued
senior republicans who had been adamant that the IRA had “left the stage” and “gone
away”.
Republican assurances cut little
ice now with the Ulster Unionist leader, Mike Nesbitt. That is hardly
surprising.
What is hard to fathom,
though, is unionist
politicians’ lack of attention to some of the Chief Constable’s other ‘clarifications’: that the Provisional
IRA is “committed to following a political path”; that it is “no longer engaged
in terrorism”; that the IRA “does not exist for paramilitary purposes”.
Moreover, the Sinn Féin
president could hardly have been more forthright in his condemnation of whoever
shot Kevin McGuigan dead. They were “criminals”, Gerry Adams suggested – in
language he would never have used of IRA members.
Surely such statements should be
a source of relief, if not necessarily a cause for celebration? Instead, we see
unionists of various hues searching high and low for an allegation, a word, a
nuance – anything that might justify withdrawal from the power-sharing
government.
Imagine for a moment that the
IRA had gone away – completely, and to unionists’ satisfaction – in 1996.
What do people believe would have happened? Where would IRA members have gone?
Would they have kept faith with a political process which has left everyone
feeling short-changed?
Conflict resolution and
peace-building are complicated, especially when there is no clear ‘winner’. We need look no
farther back than a recent war in the Middle East where – following Iraq’s defeat – the
precipitate dismantling of military, police and governance institutions led to
anarchy and chaos. Peace processes have to be managed.
The last thing Northern Ireland
needed in 1996 – or indeed needs now – is hundreds of highly committed, highly trained
former IRA members seeking some outlet, other than a peaceful one, for their disaffection.
How, other than with some lingering infrastructure – a command chain of sorts –
can former combatants be kept ‘on message’ and ‘onside’?
The late Nobel Laureate, Seamus
Heaney, captured mid-seventies Northern Ireland brilliantly, in his poem ‘Whatever
You Say, Say Nothing’:
“O
land of password, handgrip, wink and nod,
Of open minds as open as a trap,
Where tongues lie coiled as under flames lie
wicks”.
Heaney’s words seem as relevant
today as they did forty years ago.
No one likes doing ‘nod-and-wink’ politics but, in the
real world, there is a chasmic difference between politicking and realpolitik.
Had it not been for ‘back channels’ and
secret contacts between previous governments and the IRA we would all still be
stuck in a morass of violence. The supposed naivete of some politicians
nowadays is truly breath-taking.
When the Independent Commission
for the Location of Victims’ Remains
liaised with intermediaries, who did people think those intermediaries were
talking to? Why would any IRA volunteer – former or current – risk imprisonment
in cooperating with the search for the Disappeared other than on foot of an
order?
Nineteen years after the last
IRA ceasefire and seventeen after the Good Friday Agreement, we still have no sense
that our political institutions have taken root or confidence that the peace
will endure.
It will be interesting in the
coming weeks to see whether the DUP will follow the UUP’s lead by leaving the
Executive, how the SDLP will respond (although it’s difficult to envisage
them ignoring the ‘positives’ in
the Chief Constable’s
assessment), and who lines up alongside the Ulster Unionists in any new ‘Opposition’.
The people who will be most
satisfied with the latest developments will be the TUV and republican
dissidents, both of whom will be able to say, “We told you so.”
Mike Nesbitt was shrewd enough to secure the
unanimous support of his MLA Group, the party’s one MEP and two MPs for today’s
move, as well as of senior representatives of his Councillors’ Association and
the party chairman. His initiative has undoubtedly wrong-footed the DUP.
But, how wise is his gambit, when viewed
strategically? Mr Nesbitt insists today’s move is a principled one, in
response to the murder of Kevin McGuigan. Nationalists and republicans have
scented hypocrisy, though, pointing to the differing ways he treats republican
and loyalist representatives who have been linked to groups implicated in
murders.
The Ulster Unionist leader says he believes the
situation “can be fixed” but for that to happen requires “some clarity about
the IRA and its command structure”. Clarity from whom – the PSNI, Sinn Féin,
the IRA? And in what form – a statement, a gesture, sack cloth and ashes?
The Secretary of State now has a
big call to make. Tomorrow the DUP will remind her of the “responsibilities
she has to punish any party that is found to be in breach of their commitments
to exclusively peaceful and democratic means”. Ms Villiers confirmed only two
days ago that her “understanding” was very much
in line with the Chief Constable’s (Mr Hamilton
has already accepted the bona fides of the Sinn Féin leadership). She said she
was satisfied for the moment that all parties in the Northern Ireland Executive
were supportive of the principles of democracy and consent.
Northern Ireland is barren
territory for politicians but fertile ground for poets. ‘Peace comes dropping slow’, WB Yeats wrote, in his
most famous poem, The Lake Isle of Innisfree. We could not have imagined how
slowly it would come here.
Be careful what
you wish for.
No comments:
Post a Comment