The announcement that the
American firm, Stream, is creating almost a thousand new jobs in East Belfast
will take some of the heat off at least one local MLA, the beleaguered First
Minister Peter Robinson. His party has been rattled by allegations – from some
of the most strident voices in the loyalist community – of ‘neglect’ of working
class Protestant areas. The jobs-boost will quieten those critics for a while,
although I doubt whether Mr Robinson will be given much long-term credit by his
‘in-house’ detractors.
While welcomed on Laganside, news
of the expansion was received with stunned and perplexed disbelief in Derry,
where people feel like they’ve been mugged.
It’s ironic that one Programme
for Government commitment – concerning the Maze-Long Kesh project – is regarded
as a deal-breaker, while another “addressing regional imbalance as we move
ahead” – is not. It really has come to a sorry pass when the only people even talking
about the need to “rebalance” the economy are the Tories, and their “semi-detached”
Secretary of State Theresa Villiers.
Stream used to run a substantial
call centre in Derry, at one point employing up to one thousand people. What a
coincidence. The operation there began to stutter around the time the downturn
hit, finally giving up the ghost in 2011. The company now maintains a spectral
presence of only 15 staff in Derry. The whiff of rodent is almost
over-powering.
I’ve no doubt that most people in
East Belfast will say that “Londonderry” should take its oil. But the
revelation that the East Belfast jobs deal was lubricated by £3m of Invest Northern
Ireland cash makes the announcement that bit harder to swallow in the North
West, where unemployment – once endemic – now feels like a contagion. It is frightening
that in August – two thirds of the way through its stint as UK City of Culture –
there were more people signing on in Derry than at the end of last year.
Among them, I assume, were people
who worked for Stream in the past. I have no doubt that they are still perfectly
capable of doing so. The company’s reasons for developing its Belfast operation
sound unconvincing. I can think of three million better ones.
Executive ministers must have
racked up frequent-flyer bonuses aplenty as they traversed the globe – from Brazil
to China – trying to drum up business. If investors in far-off Rio and Beijing
can be induced to commit to Northern Ireland, then why can’t they be encouraged
to go the extra mile (well, 75 miles, actually), and locate in the North West?
If there are logistical, or infrastructural, or skills-deficit barriers to such
investment, then why aren’t these being tackled? What of the other PfG
commitment to “develop the ‘One Plan’ for the regeneration of Derry/Londonderry”?
There has been much talk, on both
sides of the Assembly floor, of the need to build a “shared” future. In the
Stormont bubble, that energy has been concentrated exclusively on our very
narrow definition of ‘culture’. It should be applied with even more fervour,
and much greater urgency, to economic development.
I will watch with interest to see
how Stream develops its Northern Ireland operation in future; in which
constituencies it creates new jobs; and how INI supports it. I will, of course,
apply the same level of scrutiny to other economic development as well, with
equal fervour.
Politics here is becoming so
reminiscent of the sixties that I fear I’m starting to see things only in black
and white. Sometimes, though, monochrome provides the clearest view.